No submissions related to the usage, existence or features of specific software/websites (e.g.

'TIL the definition of a word.' Word definitions/translations/origins are not appropriate here.

instead, or be more specific (and avoid the word 'about'). ' and other broad posts don't belong on TIL. Starting your title with a why/what/who/where/how modifier should be unnecessary.

Titles must be able to stand on their own without requiring readers to click on a link.

not 'TIL something interesting about bacon').

Make them descriptive, concise and specific (e.g.

Rephrase your post title if the following are not met: Posts that omit essential information, or present unrelated facts in a way that suggest a connection will be removed.

Social and economic issues (including race/religion/gender).Recent political issues and politicians.This includes (but is not limited to) submissions related to: No politics, soapboxing, or agenda based submissions. Any sources (blog, article, press release, video, etc.) with a publication date more recent than two months are not allowed. No personal opinions, anecdotes or subjective statements (e.g 'TIL xyz is a great movie'). Videos are fine so long as they come from reputable sources (e.g. Images alone do not count as valid references. Please link directly to a reliable source that supports every claim in your post title. Submit interesting and specific facts that you just found out (not broad information you looked up, TodayILearned is not /r/wikipedia). I plan to update it to a newer version soon and that update should bring in a bunch of new word senses for many words (or more accurately, lemma).You learn something new every day what did you learn today? Special thanks to the contributors of the open-source code that was used in this project: the UBY project (mentioned above), and express.js.Ĭurrently, this is based on a version of wiktionary which is a few years old. I simply extracted the Wiktionary entries and threw them into this interface! So it took a little more work than expected, but I'm happy I kept at it after the first couple of blunders. The researchers have parsed the whole of Wiktionary and other sources, and compiled everything into a single unified resource. That's when I stumbled across the UBY project - an amazing project which needs more recognition. However, after a day's work wrangling it into a database I realised that there were far too many errors (especially with the part-of-speech tagging) for it to be viable for Word Type.įinally, I went back to Wiktionary - which I already knew about, but had been avoiding because it's not properly structured for parsing. This caused me to investigate the 1913 edition of Websters Dictionary - which is now in the public domain. I initially started with WordNet, but then realised that it was missing many types of words/lemma (determiners, pronouns, abbreviations, and many more). The dictionary is based on the amazing Wiktionary project by wikimedia. And since I already had a lot of the infrastructure in place from the other two sites, I figured it wouldn't be too much more work to get this up and running. I had an idea for a website that simply explains the word types of the words that you search for - just like a dictionary, but focussed on the part of speech of the words. Both of those projects are based around words, but have much grander goals. For those interested in a little info about this site: it's a side project that I developed while working on Describing Words and Related Words.

Japan mouse utopia